Skip to main content
Evaluation run showing model scores and per-sample results

Measure the result. Inspect the change.

Generated evaluators and reproducible experiments connect production failures to changes in your code.

Evaluators grounded in the capability

Overmind generates checks from the capability’s purpose, prompt, tools and available trace evidence. Inspect the generated library, edit your own evaluators, and organize them into eval sets. Generative testing and live trace scoring use the roles appropriate to each evaluator.

Generated evaluators
Eval sets
Trace scoring
Evaluator library with capability scope and evaluator kinds

Compare on the same evidence

Evaluate recorded outputs or generate fresh responses from model and prompt variants. Each run pins its dataset version and evaluator snapshots. Compare against a baseline, inspect per-metric scores and judge reasoning, and add human annotations to samples that need review.

Pinned data
Baseline comparison
Human annotations
Evaluation scores and sample-level results

Improve prompts, tools and code

Run /overmind optimize from your agent’s repository. Your coding agent writes candidate diffs and replays them locally; Overmind scores the results against your chosen eval set. Inspect iteration scores and candidate patches, then apply the winning change through your normal code review.

Local execution
Candidate diffs
Measured improvements
Optimiser experiment with candidate scores and iterations

Test the model before you change it

Use /overmind backtest to replay the same dataset through candidate models while keeping the agent’s prompts and logic fixed. Compare quality alongside latency and cost, and inspect the samples behind the averages before choosing the next model or training experiment.

Model comparison
Shared eval set
Cost & latency
Optimiser setup with coding-agent workflow options

What you get

Evaluation

  • Reusable evaluator library

    Combine LLM judges and deterministic checks in capability-scoped or project-wide eval sets.

  • Reproducible comparisons

    Pin data, prompts and evaluators so results remain tied to what the experiment actually tested.

  • Inspectable results

    Read score rationales and sample outputs, with incomplete generations distinguished from scored results.

Optimization

  • Repository-level changes

    Test edits to prompts, tool definitions and application logic in the environment where your agent runs.

  • Model backtesting

    Compare models over a shared dataset and evaluation set with your existing harness.

  • Bounded experiments

    Choose iteration and candidate budgets, follow progress, and inspect the selected candidate and its diff.

Stop guessing, start measuring

From a production failure to a tested change in your repository.